Again, why are you focused on one-side of the argument? Why aren’t you discussing trans-men? Your argument, like Dolezal’s must work both ways. Otherwise, you are speaking out of another place. Let me give you an example. Patriarchy has a lot to say about male homosexuality and bisexuality. It says nothing and winks at female homosexuality and bisexuality. We see this in biblical times and in biblical texts, and it is in American society too. There’s a reason for those one-sided arguments. So, your one-sided argument, without any mention of trans men, sounds the same to me. Why aren’t you talking about trans men? And with respect to psychological needs and harms, these are verified. So, you must accommodate. Where is the greater harm, and the greater harm by your choices are suffered by whom? I still acknowledge the spectrum of privilege. But, I’d say you must acknowledge the harm. Privilege can be repurposed. Harm must be reduced and eliminated.