This article has a theme of anarchism between the lines. That should answer several questions. We also have to understand where and how many nations received and established their borders and policies. In any case, the freedom to move ought to be a human right. One historian says the inability to move amounts to global apartheid. With respect to homes, the legal scholar Cheryl Harris compared and described whiteness as property. Separately, there are some theorists who take issue with ownership and private property — particularly on stolen lands. People haven’t always locked their doors and some people still don’t. That’s the case around the world. In some places, people don’t have doors to lock. In general, locking reflects social conditions and fears. America engineers both. Locking both countries and homes can be a way to avoid changing policies that create inequalities both here and abroad. Unlocking countries and homes brings accountability for actions and policies that hurt people. Deal with basic income. Deal with the wealth gap. Deal with the addiction. Deal with racism. Deal with capitalism. Then let’s see what happens. Looking at citizenship, from a social standpoint, the United States hasn’t uncoupled citizenship and whiteness. Why should I? Overall, my point is citizenship, in general, as a status, functions like whiteness. Again, you can see that statement in anarchism. Undocumentedness is not a problem. Like Blackness, undocumentedness is human. Whiteness and its processes are inhumane.