Why would you put “Muslims Borders” here with “Chinese Borders and Japanese Borders”? You don’t see the difference and how you can’t group all those? One of those doesn’t belong. How are you an avid reader and learner for life? 😂. Did you avidly read this sentence in my piece, “If we revisit the racist work to classify people, we see how white Europeans and white Americans mapped humanity with borders and put whiteness at the top.” Do you know about the history of race science and the whites who categorized humanity, which was an act of border making? Plus, whites are responsible for all borders in the United States. This should be basic information that’s not hard to understand. I’m telling you that whiteness, being white, is an oppressive identity that kills Black people and people of color and want to ask me about “Chinese Borders, Japanese Borders, and Muslims Borders?” A quote from Muhammad Ali comes to mind. Why are you engaging in whataboutism? Your eyes must be burning when you read that this is about whiteness. Only white identity is purely and only based on the denial and exclusion of Black people. Only white identity. I also wrote,“Those tactics [borders] aren’t unique to whiteness, but they are significant tools whiteness uses.” And that’s the point to reveal the white borders and break them down. When you first responded, I thought you were lost. Now it seems you’re dumb and lost, and despite the many sources I’ve provided you refuse to learn. Which of us do you think knows the most on this subject? It is not you. Get to reading, Heidi. You need it.